University Students’ Experiences of Received Instruction and Their Learning Approaches: Insights from the Arabic Shortened SETLQ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64169/dje.105Keywords:
Arabic SETLQ, Teaching and Learning, Approaches to Learning, Educational Experiences, Higher EducationAbstract
This study examined undergraduate students’ experiences of teaching and learning at Qatar University using an Arabic version of the Shortened Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire (SETLQ). A total of 410 students (60.2% female), ranging in age from 18 to 33 years (M = 21.0, SD = 2.6), participated in the study. The SETLQ, originally developed in English, was translated into Modern Standard Arabic using a rigorous translation and back-translation process to ensure cultural and linguistic appropriateness. Descriptive statistics revealed that students’ expectations from higher education were primarily motivated by career goals and personal development. Students cited the importance of course content as a primary reason for enrollment, rather than intrinsic interest. Approaches to learning and studying showed a preference for deep learning and organized effort over surface-level strategies. Notably, students with higher GPAs reported significantly lower use of surface approaches compared to those with lower GPAs. Students’ perceptions of their teaching and learning environments were generally positive, with high ratings for the assessment of understanding and instructional quality. While students reported learning subject-specific knowledge and information skills, lower ratings were given to collaborative learning outcomes. Most students expressed confidence in their overall academic performance. These findings suggest that, to foster deeper learning and academic success, instructional strategies at Qatar University should aim to reduce students’ reliance on surface approaches by incorporating more opportunities for independent learning, emphasizing the relevance of course content to career goals, and promoting structured study habits. These efforts should be reinforced by aligning instruction with students’ career-oriented and personal development goals, highlighting the importance of course content, prioritizing the assessment of understanding, and deepening students’ learning of core disciplinary concepts and information technology skills.
References
[1] Alkhateeb, H. M., & Nasser, R. (2014). Assessment of learning and study strategies of university students in Qatar using an Arabic translation of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Psychological Reports, 114(3), 947–965. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.03.PR0.114k26w3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/11.03.PR0.114k26w3
[2] Al Yafei, K., Ayoubi, R. M., & Crawford, M. (2023). The student experiences of teaching and learning in transnational higher education: A phenomenographic study from a British–Qatari partnership. Journal of Studies in International Education, 27(3), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211070111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211070111
[3] Almansour, M., AlMehmadi, B. A., Zeb, N. G., Matbouly, G., Sami, W., & Badahdah, A.-M. (2023). Promising score for teaching and learning environment: An experience of a fledgling medical college in Saudi Arabia. BMC Medical Education, 23, 479. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04357-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04357-3
[4] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
[5] Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.
[6] Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Allyn and Bacon.
[7] Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). American Psychological Association.
[8] Busemeyer, M. R., & Guillaud, E. (2023). Knowledge, skills or social mobility? Citizens’ perceptions of the purpose of education. Social Policy & Administration, 57, 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12897
[9] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[10] Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303225
[11] Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.
[12] Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
[13] Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47–68). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009
[14] Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings (Occasional Report No. 1). Enhancing Teaching–Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses Project, University of Edinburgh.
[15] Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching–learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 89–108). Elsevier Science.
[16] Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an Approaches to Studying Inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173165
[17] ETL Project. (2005). Shortened Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire (SETLQ) [Measurement instrument]. Universities of Edinburgh, Durham, and Coventry.
[18] Farouqa, G., & Hysaj, A. (2022). Active learning in the lenses of faculty: A qualitative study in universities in the United Arab Emirates. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media: Applications in education and commerce (Vol. 13316, pp. 77–90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05064-0_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05064-0_6
[19] Ginns, P., Prosser, M., & Barrie, S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: The perspectives of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701573773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701573773
[20] Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147
[21] Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069034
[22] Hocevar, D., & El Zahhar, N. (1985). Test anxiety in the USA and Egypt: A paradigm for investigating psychometric characteristics across cultures. In H. M. van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 4, pp. 203–213). Swets & Zeitlinger.
[23] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
[24] Hosseini, M., Jalali, A., & Salari, N. (2022). Assessment of psychometric properties of the modified Experiences of Teaching–Learning Questionnaire in Iranian nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 22, 314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03365-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03365-z
[25] Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. (2018). Experiences of the teaching–learning environment and approaches to learning: Testing the structure of the “Experiences of Teaching and Learning” inventory in relation to earlier analyses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 506–521.
[26] Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
[27] Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359
[28] Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.82.4.623
[29] Parpala, A., Lindblom Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., & Entwistle, N. (2013). Assessing students’ experiences of teaching–learning environments and approaches to learning: Validation of a questionnaire in different countries and varying contexts. Learning Environments Research, 16, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9128-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9128-8
[30] Qatar National Vision 2030. (n.d.). General Secretariat for Development Planning. Retrieved from https://www.npc.qa/ar/pages/default.aspx#
[31] Qureshi, S. S., Larson, A. H., & Vishnumolakala, V. R. (2022). Factors influencing medical students’ approaches to learning in Qatar. BMC Medical Education, 22, 446. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03501-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03501-9
[32] Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711
[33] Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Open University Press.
[34] Shehab, M. J., Alokla, M., Alkhateeb, M., & Alokla, M. (2021). Hybrid learning aided technology rich instructional tools — a case study: Community College of Qatar. Studies in Educational Management, 10, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.32038/sem.2021.10.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32038/sem.2021.10.02
[35] Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
[36] Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x
[37] Utriainen, J., Tynjälä, P., Kallio, E., & Marttunen, M. (2018). Validation of a modified version of the Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.007
[38] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
[39] Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Open University Press.
[40] Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Haitham M. Alkhateeb, Eiman F. Abushihab
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
