Family Support, Learner Autonomy, and Digital Skills: Unpacking the Pathways to Digital Competence among College Students in Vietnam

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64169/dje.154

Keywords:

Digital Competence, Learner Autonomy, Family Support, Higher Education, Gen Z

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between ecological and motivational processes and university students' digital competence in Vietnam. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, Ecological Systems Theory, and the DigComp framework, an eco-motivational model was tested with 305 undergraduates using validated measures of perceived family support, learner autonomy, and digital competence. Regression and mediation analyses were used to assess both direct and indirect paths. Family support was found to have a positive association with digital competence. Learner autonomy was positively associated with digital competence and yielded a substantial partial mediation of the relationship between family support and digital competence. A reverse specification was not supported. The study advances theory by connecting the family microsystem to autonomy-relevant learning processes within a unified account of digital competence. It extends DigComp applications to a Global South higher education setting through a construct-aligned operationalisation of critical use, safety, and ethics, and adaptation to emerging technologies. The results support autonomy-supportive instructional design, targeted family–university communication that emphasises constructive encouragement and resource scaffolding, and curriculum policies that create structured opportunities for autonomous digital task management. Based on these findings, higher education institutions may improve students' digital competence by developing interventions to increase learner autonomy, alongside targeted family engagement.

References

[1] Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782

[2] Andina, D. M., Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2020). How English foreign language students' autonomy and digital competence relate to their writing achievement. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.5760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.5760

[3] Blanc, S., Conchado, A., Benlloch-Dualde, J. V., Monteiro, A., & Grindei, L. (2025). Digital competence development in schools: a study on the association of problem-solving with autonomy and digital attitudes. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00534-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00534-6

[4] Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

[5] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845

[6] Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons.

[7] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[8] Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organisations: The state of a science. Annual review of organisational psychology and organisational behavior, 4, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

[9] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

[10] Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks (Vol. 10, p. 82116). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

[11] Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological science, 18(3), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x

[12] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2020). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

[13] Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

[14] Hidayat-Ur-Rehman, I. (2024). Digital competence and students' engagement: a comprehensive analysis of smartphone utilisation, perceived autonomy and formal digital learning as mediators. Interactive technology and smart education, 21(3), 461-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2023-0189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2023-0189

[15] Ho, T. T. N., & Le, H.V. (2024). Challenges and Implications of Blended Learning Adoption in the Age of Communication Technology: A Case Study of Vietnamese Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic. REFLections, 31(3), 1144-1177. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.276777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.276777

[16] Holmarsdottir, H., Seland, I., Hyggen, C. (2024). How Can We Understand the Everyday Digital Lives of Children and Young People?. In: Holmarsdottir, H., Seland, I., Hyggen, C., Roth, M. (eds) Understanding The Everyday Digital Lives of Children and Young People. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46929-9_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46929-9

[17] Hussain, S. H. M., & Tasnim, R. (2023). Enhancing undergraduates' digital competencies through a mentorship model. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(SI15), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI15.5096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI15.5096

[18] Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H.-D. (2018). The relationships of family, perceived digital competence and attitude, and learning agility in sustainable student engagement in higher education. Sustainability, 10(12), 4635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124635

[19] Le, H. V. (2025). Assessing student satisfaction with MOOCs: a comprehensive analysis of Coursera's instructional design and learner experience. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42 (2): 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2024-0159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2024-0159

[20] Le, H. V., & Ho, T. T. N. (2025). Balancing act: exploring the integration of coursera MOOCs in Vietnamese higher education through a phenomenographic lens. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2507279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2507279

[21] Li, Y., Xiao, Q. L., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Chen, M., Jiang, C. H., ... & Jiang, H. (2023). Community-based intervention via WeChat official account to improve parental health literacy among primary caregivers of children aged 0 to 3 years: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1039394. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039394

[22] Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P., & Lavranos, C. (2020). A study of higher education students' self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation. Journal of documentation, 76(6), 1413-1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041

[23] Nguyen, T. Q., Ngoc, P. T. A., Phuong, H. A., Duy, D. P. T., Hiep, P. C., McClelland, R., & Noroozi, O. (2024). Digital competence of Vietnamese citizens: An application of digcomp framework and the role of individual factors. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19267–19298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12585-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12585-3

[24] Ortiz-Colón, A. M., Rodríguez-Moreno, J., & Agreda-Montoro, M. (2025). Family supervision and digital competence in primary education students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 14(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00044-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00044-x

[25] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2003-08045-010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[26] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2000-13324-007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

[27] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630

[28] Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of youth and adolescence, 34(6), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y

[29] Ting, Y. L. (2015). Tapping into students' digital literacy and designing negotiated learning to promote learner autonomy. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.004

[30] Tran, T., Ho, M., Pham, T., Nguyen, M., Nguyen, K. P., Vuong, T., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, T., Khuc, Q., La, V., & Vuong, Q. (2020). How Digital Natives Learn and Thrive in the Digital Age: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability, 12(9), 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819

[31] Trujillo-Juárez, S. I., Chaparro-Sánchez, R., Morita-Alexander, A., Escudero-Nahón, A., & Delgado-González, A. (2025). Strengthening teacher digital competence in higher education through micro-courses: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00687-0c DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00687-0

[32] Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalising or immobilising?. Journal of educational psychology, 97(3), 468. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468

[33] Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gomez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model (No. JRC101254). Joint Research Centre.

[34] Wei, S., Teo, T., Malpique, A., & Lausen, A. (2022). Parental autonomy support, parental psychological control and Chinese university students' behavior regulation: The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 735570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735570

[35] Wijana, I. N. (2022). The influence of family support, perceived digital competence and attitude, and learning agility on the speed of completing student studies with the role of academic Self-Efficacy as a mediation variable. JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning), 7(2), 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v7i2.3255

[36] Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

[37] Zhao, Y., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Prieto, R. (2025). Adapting to crisis and unveiling the digital shift: a systematic literature review of digital competence in education related to COVID-19. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1541475). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541475

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Nguyen, S. H. T., & Yao Cheng, S. (2025). Family Support, Learner Autonomy, and Digital Skills: Unpacking the Pathways to Digital Competence among College Students in Vietnam. Dibon Journal of Education, 1(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.64169/dje.154

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.